Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan(JEP) lends to empirical research or conceptual articles in economics that complement development planning, regional economics, public economics, industrial economics, safety economics, international economics, Islamic economics, finance and banking


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Vol 7, No 2 (2016)

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The articles published in the Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan are reviewed first by Peer Reviewers before they are published. The publishing decision of submitted article is determined by the Chief Editor in the Editorial Board forum which is based on recommendations or comments from Peer Reviewers.

Screening Plagiarism of the texts that go into this journal is done with the help of Google Scholar and Grammarly


Open Access Policy

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Frequency

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan is a Journal published online twice a year in the middle of the year (June) and in the end of the year (December)


Article Processing Charges

Every article submitted to Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan will not have any 'Article Processing Charges'. This includes peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving, and allows immediate access to the full text versions of the articles


Plagiarism Check

Every article accepted by Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan shall be an object to Grammarly writing-enhancement program conducted by Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Editorial Board


References Management

Every article submitted to Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan shall use reference management application e.g. Mendeley


Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics
Journal of Economics and Development or Journal of Economics and Development (in English) is a peer-revealed journal that publishes empirical research or conceptual articles relating to economics and development studies.

Author's Duties

Reporting Standards: The author must present an accurate report of the work carried out as well as an objective discussion of its meaning. The author must provide honest results and without falsification, falsification, or manipulation of inappropriate data. The underlying data must be represented fully accurately in the paper. Details and adequate references for others. Replicate works wherever possible. False or intentionally inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable policies. Papers must follow the journal delivery guidelines.

Originality and Plagiarism: Writers must ensure that they have written the original work, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others who have been approved or requested appropriately.

Multiple, Redundant, or Simultaneous Publications: A writer generally does not have to publish manuscripts that basically discuss the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same text to a full journal is related to unethical and unacceptable discussions. Several publications from a research project must be published and primary publications must be referred.

Recognition of Resources: Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors must cite publications that discuss the nature of the work presented.

Essay Papers: Essays must be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research conducted. All who have made significant contributions must be approved by co-authors. Where there are others who have been approved in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must approve or contribute as contributors. The appropriate author must ensure that all suitable joint authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and all joint authors have seen and accessed the final version of this paper and have obtained their submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any other financial or substantive conflict of interest that might be asked to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be approved.

Fundamental Mistakes in Published Works: When the writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published works, it is asking the author to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and use the same as the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Dangers and Subjects of Humans or Animals: If this work uses chemicals, procedures or equipment that have hazards not related to their use, the author must explain this in the text.

Editor's Duties

Publication Decision: The editors are responsible for deciding which articles sent to journals should be published based on reports from the Journal Review Board. The editors are guided by the policy of the Journal Editorial Board and approved by applicable legal requirements relating to defamation, overcoming copyright, and plagiarism. The editor can negotiate with the editor or choose another in making this decision. Editors are responsible for everything they publish and have procedures and policies to guarantee the quality of publications.

Manuscript Review: The editors must ensure that each manuscript must be evaluated first for results. The editor must wisely manage and use peer reviews. The editor notifies the author of the peer review process and also indicates which part of the journal is reviewed. The editors must choose the right peer reviewer for each text by selecting those obtained based on their area of expertise.

Fair play: Editors at all times discuss manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the author. The editors must uphold the principles of independence and integrity in carrying out all their duties.

Confidentiality: Editors, discussed, and editorial staff may not disclose any information about the manuscript issued to anyone other than the author, discuss, explore the potential, the editorial team, and the publisher


Author Guidelines

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan(JEP) lends to empirical research or conceptual articles in economics that complement development planning, regional economics, public economics, industrial economics, safety economics, international economics, Islamic economics, finance and banking


Screening for Plagiarism Policy

To ensure the authenticity of articles, the Journal of Economics and Development uses TURNITIN. Plagiarism checks are carried out in the process of screening the manuscripts that are sent. Only plagiarism-free manuscripts sent to editors are assigned to be followed up by the review process. Submissions with minor plagiarism issues will be notified to be revised and sent back, while texts with serious plagiarism issues will be rejected and filed.


Author and Editing fee Policy


The Budapest Open Access Initiative

Responding to the increasing demand to make research free and available to anyone with a computer and internet connection, a diverse coalition has issued new guidelines that can usher in great progress in economics.

The recommendations were developed by leaders of the Open Access movement, who have worked over the past decade to give the public unlimited free access to scientific research - which is largely publicly funded. Making research publicly available to everyone - free and without copyright and licensing restrictions - will accelerate scientific research efforts and allow writers to reach more readers. The recommendations are the result of a meeting organized by the Open Society Foundation to mark the tenth anniversary of the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which was first defined as Open Access. The recommendations include developing Open Access policies in higher education institutions and donors, open licensing for scientific work, developing infrastructure such as Open Access repositories and creating standards of professional behavior for the issuance of Open Access. The recommendations also set a new goal of achieving Open Access as a standard method for distributing research reviewed by new colleagues in each field and in each country within ten years. Translation recommendations have been made in several languages, with more to follow. For more on recommendations, please see the press release and blog post by Peter Suber which provides additional background on the Open Access movement.

Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative

An old tradition and a new technology have been converged to make possible an impossible public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unlimited online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.